Debate the pro' and cons of death penalty Essay

Debate the pro and cons of death penalty - Essay ExampleUsage of powerful killing drugs has been now put to use for the extermination of criminals sentenced to detonating device punishment. There was a time when this noble profession of medicinal drug was utilise only for the purpose to serve mankindkind and heal. But now it has taken a new turn and physicians are being turned into achievementers with the different techniques evolving for seat of government punishment. There has been an instant where there has been an excellent example given, the case of the Abu Ghuraib who was the alleged man behind the 9/11 attacks being held prisoner in Guantanamo bay prison where he was harassmentd by physicians and also that physicians are used for torture prisoners often. Dr. David Waisel, a physician participation in capital punishment proceeding (Mayo Clin Proc.2007 82(9) 1073-1080), described this in terms of saying that what physicians consider dehumanizing the condemned through tort ure during execution process. They dehumanize themselves and grow numb to the idea of death and killing. John Bright (1811-1899), a British Quaker and member of Parliament, put it thus in 1868 that it is genuinely the police force of capital punishment tends to destroy the fact that reverence for life finishes.There was thing heading under which the basic idea strewn together was that unify States does not permit execution of children. Here the idea that is being projected was that United States has allowed the execution of children. In the biological sense, teenagers are considered as children but the law states that children above the age of 14 are considered as adolescents and are vulnerable to commit capital offense therefore they are also candidates who, if commit discourtesy can be taken care off using capital punishment which the adults get.Considering another heading which state that the barbarism is being disguised as an act of benevolence referring to the physicians be ing involved and victorious up the role of that their respective field doesnt allow. It also discusses the idea that this capital punishment which has now been slow converting physicians to mere executioners by making them to take potent medicines. A medicine which was at one time meant to cure people is now being used against them. This whole act by physicians is called barbaric and also that this mal practice of medicine is considered to be hypocritical to the oath of medicine and physicians. Saving lives isnt the deed but taking has been nowadays. Instead of easing pain the condemned go through torture and succumb to the ultimate, death. Here Dr David Waisel argues, as to why not make death easier for the condemned using medicine and not increase sufferings. Its the final act of benevolence that could be acted out even if it for the sinner.Article 2Cathleen Kaveny (2008). Justice or Vengeance IS THE DEATH punishment CRUEL & UNUSUAL February 15, 2008. Commonweal. In this article the author throws light on the very delicate issue of taking the decision as to what lengths should a capital punishment or death penalties go and yet not touch the boundaries of