United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

unify States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 - Case Study Exampley afforded to law enforcement officers, and on the other a deviation from well-established rule against illegal searches and seizures diminishing a commonly accepted constitutional right.Cruikshank (1986) thus ascertains that The inquiry no longer is whether the fourth amendment was violated but whether the deterrent effect of the exclusionary rule outweighs the potential price of losing valuable evidence (p. 417). There is now a shift from individual rights to the duties of police officers in establishing the correct application of the Constitution as determined by the judiciary. This is a far cry from the basic premise of any constitution as the fundamental law of the land. It must serve as a limit on the powers of government and a reminder of the supremacy of the people. The inclusion of probable cause in the criterion for the issuance of a warrant was a important statement as to the powers that may be accorded in the prop er disturbance of a person in his rights. The defense of good faith seems as an unaccented enough loophole to violate what I ardently believed to be a constitutional right despite how the Supreme Court ruled otherwise.Cruikshank, C. (1986). Dismantling the exclusionary rule United States v. Leon and the courts of Washington-should good faith excuse bad acts? University of Puget Sound Law Review, 9. Retrieved from